It's sad some people look at the release date of an album and then decide if they want to listen to it or not! I can see a statement like "new bands are boring while old ones rule" at least as a hilarious one, as much as a childish and immature generalization like "new bands are worst than the old ones". This only proves you haven't listened to more than 5 new bands. It's better comparing music per se than dates. How long do you think that metal will last without new bands coming out by the way, if you believe that metal is still alive because of underground demo bands? Saying all new bands suck doesn't do justice to hundreds of worthwhile new comers that do a fantastic job, maybe you should try checking out a few and do yourself a favor dude! no matter how good some old bands were, good music didn't stop in the 80's.

Bizarre comments. People acting as if EVERYTHING MP do hasn't been done, and better in the past, they are in no way original. I have the demo tape and thought it was forgettable. The latest album which I'm again listening to on YouTube to make sure, is ok, much better than the demo, but it's not hitting me hard and saying I need this now.

It's surprising that attitudes so negative towards old demos even exist here on this board, to me I can't think anyone really likes metal unless they have some love for the lo-fi demo stuff with all of their sometime shortcomings. Again, this Marken guy, just baffles me. From calling Angel Witch "generic" and "boring" and getting their new record but refusing to do so with their debut simply because it's "old", and now saying no 80's demos are interesting, sorry dude, but have you got some mental issues? "Everyone's preferences are different" and all that PC bullshit aside it's on par with saying my gay lover, Iron Savior, Nightwish, are superior to Judas Priest Maiden and Omen.

end of story.

Everyone's tastes are different.

People buy releases that they like and that they can afford, end of story.

Sindrome, Morbid Saint, and Sepultura (Beneath the Remains circa)

BTW, are you going to update your webpage?

Also, this is a pretty damn kick ass cover but I still think you should consider putting the original tape cover on the reverse side like you have some of your other releases.

Sorry dudes, this is an RHW release and the specific RWH layout requirements apply to it.

Besides, the original art is lost and all I've been given is a scan from an inkjet printout made from a low-res image (probably the same taken from M-A). Which would be sufficient if I was releasing a postal-stamp version of the album, but definitely not good for CD cover artwork...

So yeah, in a nutshell, unless you are, or know the original artist and can provide me with the original art in native hi-resolution, we go with the options currently available.

But no worries, the original art will be included in the booklet somewhere, as part of a collage or something.